I am pleased observe eHarmony responding in their official weblog to an article called “Marriage-Maker states tend to be Tied in Knots ” from the Wall Street Journal. The WSJ post examines certain marriage statistics circulated by adult dating sites like eHarmony and the methodology used to calculate such stats. We chatted a little about it topic as well, fourteen days ago whenever the initial WSJ article ended up being published (see tale).
The WSJ article did not turn to kindly on the stats released by internet dating sites, and for the most part I buy into the author. The public does need to know how these stats tend to be generated. Of all the internet dating sites mentioned from inside the WSJ article, “eHarmony shines as on the list of a lot more cautious ones”. This isn’t exactly a glowing report for eHarmony therefore, they chose to publish a response to their weblog.
Inside eHarmony article each goes into more precisely how they calculated that their unique dating website ended up being accountable for 2per cent of marriages in the usa, through the 12-month period finishing March 2007. A lot of the information we already understood about from a previously introduced PDF document titled “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 Marriage Metrics many eHarmony Marriages” (see Story), nevertheless the post really does cleanse a few more details. Just what this website post really does tv series is actually, eHarmony is attempting to get as available and clear along with their study findings that you can. I believe the name “Open telecommunications” may undoubtedly be your best option your formal eHarmony blog.
Here’s the complete eHarmony response to the Wall Street log about how precisely they assess their marriage statistics. For additional details about this dating site, browse the summary of eHarmony.